|
Click the sign icon at left to go
back, or directly return to the Roadgap root index.
|
The Mass Grave is my grab bag of interesting incomplete surveys of routes long gone that don't merit separate entries of their own, particularly left-over signage or evidence of old signage that remains, or sometimes things that are just plain weird or bizarre related to a state highway's history whether vintage signs or not. Some of these mini-entries may graduate to full entries in the future, but for now, please enjoy them in miniature and keep your voices down in respect for others visiting the cemetery.
See individual entries for dates of photography.
![]() |
CA 7
photographed February 2005
The thumbnail at right opens a new window with a scrolling Flash map of Los Angeles freeways (Flash 6.0 is required). Note how the Long Beach Freeway is signed CA 7 in 1984 (before the renumbering) and earlier, and only appears as I-710 in the final map section. (Prior to being CA 7 it was CA 15, but that introduced an obvious duplicate with Interstate 15. None of the old CA 15 signage is left.)
The most obvious evidence of CA 7 is on the bridge signs; this is only one
of many (I also saw them posted on NB I-710 @ Willow St and Florence Ave,
and I imagine there are others), chosen because it
demonstrates clearly its presence on modern-day I-710. This picture was taken
at great personal risk and the annoyance of other drivers on SB I-710 at
Pacific Coast Highway in the collector lane. To save your eyes and
my bandwidth, here is an enlargement
of the bridge sign at lower right, clearly showing both I-710 (on the
rear sign) and old CA 7.
Entire original image (90.3KB) |
![]() |
This is an old-style postmile sign and old-style bridge marker, both still
present. NB I-710 at I-405 interchange, in the collector lane, mercifully
with no one behind allowing me some time for a clear shot.
Entire original image (146.7KB) |
![]() |
One of the most baffling gaffes is this overhead sign at Floral Drive
and N. Ford Blvd. Despite obvious recent upgrades (based on
the new-style I-710 sign), the overhead street sign still says CA 7.
Incredibly, this was still up as of summer 2012.
Entire original image (116.5KB) |
![]() |
CA 7's original routing went all the way to what is now I-210, and
Caltrans means to finish
the job. Look on the maps above for a wee little stub of CA 7 (and
Route 710)
just south of the present-day I-210/CA 134 interchange. This stub rams into
California Blvd going south, and comes off Pasadena Ave going north, signed
as access to I-210 and CA 134. However, immediately after getting on from
Pasadena Avenue, we see this bridge sign identifying the route as CA 7.
Entire original image (117.8KB) |
![]() |
Once the through route is completed, this will be the northern terminus for
Route 710. Construction was occurring even as I was driving by.
Entire original image (111.8KB) |
![]() |
Look! It's the new Laurel Canyon-Pasadena Bypass Fwy! Now with even MORE
community opposition and real beetroot flavour!!! (Just kidding; look at
the callbox for what this really is.)
Entire original image (117.5KB) |
![]() |
710 on bridge signage on east I-210, merging with CA 134, down through the
tunnels; same interchange, but just from the northern side.
Entire original image (118.2KB) |
![]() |
CA 14U "Unrelinquished"
photographed May 2005
In basic terms, when an alignment is abandoned in California (normally after a routing has been moved or deleted), it doesn't just go away; Caltrans has to go through a legislative process called relinquishment where maintenance of the road is offered back to the city or county through which it runs, and the city/county then votes to accept it. Until then, even though the alignment is abandoned, it still carries a route number even though it's not a state highway anymore. To denote this state of bureaucratic limbo, a "U" for "Unrelinquished" is added to the route number; one example of this is CA 103 north of CA 1, which is not part of the legislative routing anymore, and thus is technically CA 103U because the state hasn't yet given (in this case) the city of Long Beach back the actual land the road is on even though the legislative definition of CA 103 no longer goes past that point. Because the U basically marks the route for eventual legislative destruction, it would seem very silly to sign a route with Unrelinquished markers because why would you waste the money on manufacturing and putting up shields -- let alone custom-made shields with the "U" designation -- on a route you intend to dismantle anyway? Regardless, that's exactly what Caltrans did with CA 14U, an unrelinquished portion of the route's old Sierra Hwy alignment (Sierra Hwy being former US 6) running parallel to the modern CA 14 Antelope Valley Fwy in northern Los Angeles county. For those unfamiliar with it, CA 14 serves Lancaster, Palmdale and Mojave, all the way up to its termination at modern US 395; the freeway was built in segments between 1963 and 1975. However, obviously not all parts of the alignment were apparently relinquished, and that leaves us with a bizarre stretch of signs that to my knowledge have no similar peer anywhere else in the state. While I don't know when they were placed, they are obviously of recent vintage. According to Google Maps, these signs all exist within Santa Clarita city limits, although portions of the alignment have already been relinquished (south of PM T26.8 at San Fernando Rd, old CA 126, is no longer 14U as of 9/02). There are no signs north of the intersection depicted (Friendly Valley Pkwy), so I assume it was relinquished past here as well. This makes it a logical starting point for us, and we'll U-turn at the light to go south. Entire original image (115.5KB) |
![]() |
First 14U sign at Sierra Hwy and Rainbow Glen,
originally spotted by Paul DeRocco, whose report in
ca.driving prompted me to go take a look.
Entire original image (123.4KB) |
![]() |
The Golden Valley Rd intersection doesn't have a 14U on the mastarm going
south, but the back of the northbound shield is seen here. We'll come back
in a little bit.
Entire original image (147.8KB) |
![]() |
14U shield descending south towards Placerita Cyn Rd.
Entire original image (144.2KB) |
![]() |
Dockweiler Drive.
Entire original image (117.8KB) |
![]() |
Apparent southernmost "terminus" of sorts of 14U, at old CA 126. There
is no CA 14U shield on the mastarm here at San Fernando Rd, and no 14U
shields south of here. However, there is a pattern of glue damage on this
sign to the left showing where the old CA 126 button copy used to be; click
the thumbnail for a separate window with an enhanced
high-contrast/threshold-gated image and
compare it with the unenhanced picture (look at the pink arrows to see the
spade outline and the numbers; step back from the screen a bit if it's not
immediately obvious).
An old postmile just south of this intersection shows PM 26.5 (just before
the cemetery, if you're in the area). Note that
there are no postmiles of any sort along the stretch I've photographed.
We turn around and start heading north again.
Entire original image (123.2KB) |
![]() |
First shield north of San Fernando Rd. The freeway is in the background.
Entire original image (109.3KB) |
![]() |
Dockweiler Dr again.
Entire original image (101.6KB) |
![]() |
Placerita Cyn Rd.
Entire original image (143.2KB) |
![]() |
Finally, the shield facing northbound traffic on Golden Valley Rd.
Entire original image (106.3KB) |
![]() |
Last shield, once again on Rainbow Glen Dr. I checked on Sierra Hwy as far
north as Soledad Cyn Rd and did not find any other 14U shields, and there
are none on Sierra Hwy approaching The Old Rd. If people have any other
field reports of these, I'll add them in here. Who knows how long they'll
be up ...
Entire original image (102.1KB) |
![]() |
CA 31 and TEMP I-15
photographed March 2005
It can be argued that CA 31 was never really a route in its own right, merely a legislative stub until I-15 was built (in this case, between Corona and Rancho Cucamonga/Ontario, although at least one of my maps from 1974 seems to indicate that the stub at Devore that would eventually be signed I-15 was also at some point signed CA 31). It was not created as a route until 1964 when I-15 was already well on the books, and CA 31 would be deleted in favour of the Interstate a mere ten years later in 1974 (although signs remained up for a time until the Interstate was completed, thereby making them pointless).
The thumbnail to the right opens up a new window with a 64K slice of a 1976
map showing CA 31's alignment along Hamner and Milliken Avenues, co-signed
as I-15. (The Devore stub is at the top right.)
At the present-day CA 60/I-15 interchange in Mira Loma, we have several
interesting remnants of CA 31 and even TEMP I-15 which literally float right
in front of our face.
Entire original image (95.5KB) |
![]() |
As shown on the CA 126 sign above, Caltrans likes to recycle their signs
and prefers to alter them rather than make new ones if possible. Thus, when
that segment of CA 126 was decommissioned, Caltrans simply stripped the
button copy of the shield off, leaving tell-tale glue damage behind.
So is it also with this advance signage indicating the I-15 interchange, and
under optimum light can even be seen with the naked eye (around 8 or 9am was
when these photos were taken). Click the thumbnail at right for an 11K
enhanced high-contrast and threshold-gated image showing the old exit
right under the "new" button copy -- Hamner and Milliken, and a 31 shield.
Entire original image (98.5KB) |
![]() |
As we approach the Mira Loma interchange, built in 1986, we find several more
interesting pieces of evidence. Keep the overhead signs in this particular
shot in mind, as we will be looking at them segment by segment.
Entire original image (71.4KB) |
![]() |
The most high-yield part of the interchange signage is the centre plate,
where the morning
sun striking it shows a designator (probably TEMP), an Interstate shield,
and Norco, Corona, NEXT RIGHT. Click the thumbnail at right for a 32K
enhanced high-contrast image and compare the two.
Entire original image (64.6KB) |
![]() |
A Route 31 shield appears on the left part of the overhead sign also, although
its damage pattern is a bit more worn. Next to the Hamner Ave/Milliken
Ave text is a faint area of glue damage showing a miner's spade and the
digits 31. Unlike the other enhancements, however, this one required a lot
of contrast boost to bring out (click the thumbnail at right for the
high-contrast/threshold-gated image). The miner's spade, indicated by the
long green arrow, was easy to illustrate, but the digits are a lot fainter
(indicated by the two short arrows). Crossing your eyes or stepping back
from the monitor helps a little.
Entire original image (76.1KB) |
![]() |
The "NEXT RIGHT" in the sign above
is indicating the exit for Hamner Ave and Milliken Ave, just past the I-15
interchange. Note the suspicious gap between the edge of the sign and the
button copy.
Entire original image (83.6KB) |
![]() |
This is, of course, because something used to be there. The most obvious
to the naked eye is another Interstate shield and (presumed) TEMP
marker, but on the high-contrast view, a miner's spade appears. I ran the
image through the threshold-gating filter in Photoshop and was able to
isolate the "3" in Route 31 from it, but even obscenely high amounts of
threshold boost could not generate enough contrast to pop out the "1".
The threshold-gated portion is overlaid on the image to show where it
appears in relationship to the other components. Click the thumbnail for
the 53K full image.
Entire original image (63.8KB) |
![]() |
US 60
photographed May 2005
Nevertheless, at the Beaumont interchange, the US 60 shield is still up, ill-covered by a CA 60 greenout plate (enlargement at right). Note how the original US 60 shield does not have button copy. Much of the US 60 expressway between Beaumont and Moreno Valley is still more or less in its original form, making it a fascinating trip back through time. Drive carefully, however, as the Badlands route is very substandard with respect to curves, grades and shoulder space.
Continue on to the US 91 entry for some maps showing the Riverside freeway
sign changes through time.
Entire original image (99.1KB) |
![]() |
CA 65
photographed October 2005
Dan Faigin mentions that
CA 65 was routed on US 99E, but it also seems that it was routed on US 40 as
there are Historic US 40 signs all over Riverside Avenue.
Entire original image (143.4KB) |
![]() |
US 91
photographed April 2005
The thumbnail at right opens a new window with a scrolling Flash map of Inland Empire freeways (Flash 6.0 is required), as referenced in the US 60 entry above. Notice the US 60 and US 91 freeways in the San Bernardino/Riverside area from 1947 to 1963, and their subsequent resignage as CA 60 and CA 91 (ATGR), respectively, in 1965.
Again, this mini-exhibit depends on the fact Caltrans reuses a lot of their
signage; this likely suspect seems to date from the original US 91 freeway,
built 1957 to 1961, and stands at the modern Tyler Street/CA 91 interchange
south of the freeway in western Riverside.
Entire original image (126.9KB) |
![]() |
When we get up close to the sign and the light hits it,
again we see the ghosts of glue damage, but the clue that this is probably
from the US 91 days is right in front of us: the control city is still
listed as Long Beach, which was true before the Great Renumbering, but wrong
now. On the 72K high-contrast view (click the thumbnail to the right),
we also see the ghosts of two control cities above it, San Bernardino
and then Riverside, as well as a "Freeway" legend behind the current CA 91
shield, which was typical signage for some of the older freeways in this
area (old US 395 -- now I-215
-- has a sign like this
near the Columbia Avenue interchange in northern Riverside).
None of this is as incontrovertible as, say, a big fat US shield pattern,
but it still makes for interesting conjecture.
Entire original image (110.2KB) |
![]() |
US 99 photographed October
2005
Who doesn't know US 99? This is one of the big ones, the highway everyone's trying to travel when they're not frolicking on US 66. If you've been hiding in a hole for the last half-century, US 99 ran from the Mexican border south of El Centro, CA, through San Bernardino and Los Angeles, then through Bakersfield and Fresno, and into Oregon and Washington states pretty much along the course of Interstate 5 to Portland and Seattle into Canada. Its receiving highway in British Columbia is still BC 99, and most of the leftover alignments in all three states are still signed as OR 99 or WA 99, or in this case, CA 99. CA 99 still serves Fresno along what is the largest of the old 99 alignments, leaving Fresno the largest city in the United States not served by an Interstate as of this writing (I-5 runs on a bypass alignment considerably further west). All that to say that when you find a US 99 shield in the wild, it's a big thing; here's two (and another two on the northbound side), at Atwater, improperly covered with state shields a la US 60 above. Entire original image (99.1KB) |
![]() |
CA 118 photographed
February 2007
Before all that, however, CA 118 actually went far south of Sunland
along Foothill Boulevard (parallel to I-210) to terminate at US 66 in
Pasadena; I-210 technically replaced CA 118 with the 1964 redesignation,
although much of the
old highway persisted well into the 1970s. This former routing can be seen
in the 1957 map at left, including the old Foothill Freeway (which still
survives, not to be confused with I-210 itself, which is the new
Foothill Freeway -- see Old Highway 30).
For this reason, it should not
be surprising that this sign showing the old routing on Foothill still stands
in Sunland Park, just east of the Interstate.
[Or rather, it used to - as of 4/2010, this sign is gone. I will keep
the photographs up here as a memorial, since I rather liked it.]
Entire original image (131.5KB) |
![]() |
Notice, however, that it is 1) not button copy -- instead using the old
plastic reflectors -- and 2) using the older black-on-white shield style
that has not been in service since the 1964 renumbering.
Entire original image (80.1KB) |
![]() |
There is no date code on the back, just the panels holding the reflectors
in. It is the only piece of signage for old CA 118 that I have found in this
area, but I imagine it was left alone
since the real CA 118 is only a few miles north.
Entire original image (121.9KB) |
![]() |
CA 163 (Old) photographed
November 2005
No, not that CA 163 -- the first one. As defined in 1964, old CA 163 ran from Lacy Street and Avenue 26 along Ave 26 to Interstate 5 in Los Angeles (an old stub, apparently, of US 99). This lasted for only a year and I have never found it on any maps, although Dan Faigin has the legislative history. So, credit where credit is due to the sharp-eyed Stan Konar, who wrote in one fine November day to tell me that old CA 163 lives, and live it does -- here's a bridge sign on SB Ave 26 showing it (sadly defaced), along with an(other) anachronistic reference to CA 11, or modern CA 110, which it crosses. Entire original image (157.8KB) |
![]() |
The bridge itself is very stately despite the abuse, and carries a date of
1939.
Entire original image (118.1KB) |
![]() |
Overlooking CA 110, the Arroyo Seco Parkway portion, SB towards Los Angeles
(actually facing west).
Entire original image (134.7KB) |
![]() |
The sign also appears on the other side of the bridge, too (here looking
north, and also maddeningly vandalized -- is
there nothing those buttheads won't tag?).
Entire original image (145.7KB) |
![]() |
View towards CA 110, northbound (facing east)
to Pasadena this time. In 1965, CA 163 was
deleted; the number did not come back into use until 1969, when it was
assigned to the former US 395 freeway in
San Diego. That remains CA 163's present designation to this day.
Entire original image (151.1KB) |
![]() |
CA 164 "CA 19"
photographed February 2007
CA 164 today is a little known (and almost completely unsigned) route between Pico Rivera and Sierra Madre along most of Rosemead Boulevard. "But, wait!" I hear you cry. "This is Route 19!" Well, actually, no, it's not. In fact, this is one of those rare circumstances apart from multiplexes where the legislative route number no longer matches the signed highway, and was actually introduced with the 1964 renumbering that was supposed to eliminate such inconsistencies! The reason why CA 19 remains over the entire route is because it in fact did possess the whole route between Long Beach to US 66/Foothill Blvd in Sierra Madre before the 1964 renumbering (although apparently over San Gabriel Blvd just a couple blocks west). Unlike many deleted or altered route numbers where the signage eventually caught up with the route number on the books, this never happened for CA 19. Today, CA 19 ends internally at the otherwise nondescript Gallatin Rd in Pico Rivera, and CA 164 continues north from there on Rosemead Blvd, but not on the signage where the signed end of CA 19 was and remains here, now at I-210. Entire original image (96.1KB) |
![]() |
However, the bridge postmile rats the actual route out, signed as the
210/164 separation.
Entire original image (125.6KB) |
![]() |
CA 195
photographed July 2005 and July 2008
Entire original image (83KB) |
![]() |
On the overpass, an ancient postmile still marks this
bridge as old CA 195.
Entire original image (164.1KB) |
![]() |
Directional signage at the exit. North of this point is the Joshua Tree
Nat'l Monument.
Entire original image (90.8KB) |
![]() |
In 1972, CA 195 between I-10 and CA 111 was deleted
and in 2003 it was completely decommissioned, though signs remain,
when the CA 86S expressway was finished. The inset map at right shows the
truncated alignment from 1974.
All that remains now is this twisty, poorly maintained road to Mecca and a
fair bit of lonely desert.
Entire original image (89.6KB) |
|
All images, photographs and multimedia, unless otherwise stated, are
copyright © 2004-2013 Cameron Kaiser. All rights reserved. All writeups
are copyright © 2004-2013 Cameron Kaiser. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized copying or duplication without express consent of the copyright
holder is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sitemaster to request permission if
you wish to use items from this page.
|
|